The Boston ArchiveBoston, Massachusetts

Claim · the gray record

Roxbury was formerly named Rocksbury

Roxbury was formerly named Rocksbury

This is an attestation. The archive records who asserts it, since when, and on what evidence. It does not rule on whether it is true.

Subject
Roxbury
Predicate
former_name
Attested by
Burrage, Walter Lincoln, A guide-book of Boston for physicians
Attestor kind
scholar
Attested since, as stated
1906
Attestation strength
single source — a count of independent attestations, never a truth value
Variant note
An early spelling, and a statement about the ground.

Evidence

Burrage, Walter Lincoln, A guide-book of Boston for physicians (1906)

It was called Rocksbury or Rocksborough, from the great ledge of rocks running through it, the so-called Roxbury pudding-stone.

the document in this archive · source

Questions this record answers

Each answer is composed only from fields this record carries, and names the attestation for what it says. A question the record cannot answer from its own attested content is not asked here. Where a boundary is described as official it was promulgated by an authority with the power to draw it and is not amended by anything on the vernacular layer; where it is described as vernacular it is held by attestation alone and amends no official boundary.

Who attests that Roxbury was formerly named Rocksbury?

Burrage, Walter Lincoln, A guide-book of Boston for physicians attests it, as scholar, since 1906. The archive records the attestation strength as single source — a count of independent attestations, never a truth value.

Attested by: Internet Archive — Boston texts, retrieved 5 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929.

What evidence does the archive hold for this claim?

1 evidence row supports the claim. The passage carrying the attestation reads: “It was called Rocksbury or Rocksborough, from the great ledge of rocks running through it, the so-called Roxbury pudding-stone.” A claim with no evidence row is served with that fact stated rather than served bare.

Attested by: Burrage, Walter Lincoln, A guide-book of Boston for physicians (1906)

Does the archive say this claim is true?

No. This archive does not adjudicate. It records who attests an assertion, since when, and on what evidence, and it assigns no truth value and no rating. Sibling attestations of this same assertion share the group roxbury-former_name and are served beside it. Variants of one assertion are served together, unranked and unresolved.

Attested by: Internet Archive — Boston texts, retrieved 5 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929.

What does the archive hold for Roxbury was formerly named Rocksbury, and under what license?

The Boston Archive holds this record of Roxbury was formerly named Rocksbury from Internet Archive — Boston texts, retrieved 5 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929 (public domain). 3 recorded transforms stand between the retrieved bytes and this record. Attribution is due to Burrage, Walter Lincoln.

Attested by: Internet Archive — Boston texts, retrieved 5 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929.

Related records

Identity

Identifier
urn:lemay:boston:claim:roxbury-former-name-rocksbury-a-guide-book-of-boston-for-p
Canonical URL
https://boston.fyi/claim/roxbury-former-name-rocksbury-a-guide-book-of-boston-for-p
As JSON
https://boston.fyi/claim/roxbury-former-name-rocksbury-a-guide-book-of-boston-for-p.json
Version
1 · last changed 5 September 2026

Provenance

Source
Internet Archive — Boston texts — source of record
License
Public domain — published before 1929 (public_domain)
Retrieved
5 September 2026
Source identifier
a-guide-book-of-boston-for-physicians#rocksbury
Attribution
Burrage, Walter Lincoln
Rights as stated
NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT (Internet Archive item rights review), corroborated by the item's own publication date of 1906 — before 1929, and therefore in the public domain in the United States

Transform ladder

#OperationDescriptionTool
1readsearched a text the archive itself holds, not a source it merely knows ofarchive-ingest 0.1.0
2testrequired ONE sentence to carry the name at a word boundary, a naming verb, and the subject — all three, or nothingarchive-ingest 0.1.0
3quotetook that sentence unaltered as the evidence for this claimarchive-ingest 0.1.0