The Boston ArchiveBoston, Massachusetts

Folklore

Old Esther Dudley

Boston had surrendered. Washington was advancing from the heights where he had trained his guns on the British works, and Sir William Howe lingered at the door of Province House,--last of the royal governors who would stand there,--and cursed and waved his hands and beat his…

Work

Type
folk narrative
Creator
Charles M. Skinner
Created, as stated
1896

The tale

Boston had surrendered. Washington was advancing from the heights where he had trained his guns on the British works, and Sir William Howe lingered at the door of Province House,--last of the royal governors who would stand there,--and cursed and waved his hands and beat his heel on the step, as if he were crushing rebellion by that act. The sound brought an old woman to his side. “Esther Dudley!” he exclaimed. “Why are you not gone?” “I shall never leave. As housekeeper for the governors and pensioner of the king, this has been my home; the only home I know. Go back, but send more troops. I will keep the house till you return.” “Grant that I may return,” he cried. “Since you will stay, take this bag of guineas and keep this key until a governor shall demand it.” Then, with fierce and moody brow, the governor went forth, and the faded eyes of Esther Dudley saw him nevermore. When the soldiers of the republic cast about for quarters in Boston town, they spared the official mansion to this old woman. Her bridling toryism and assumption of old state amused them and did no harm; indeed, her loyalty was half admired; beside, nobody took the pride in the place that she did, or would…

Narrative type
place legend
The printing this telling comes from
Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896) (1896)
First attestation in print
1886 — the earliest printing the archive holds. Nathaniel Hawthorne, Twice-told Tales (1886) — the earliest printing of this tale the archive holds

The attestation

This archive holds a printing of this tale older than the collection its own telling comes from, and the passage below is the tale where it stands in that older volume. It is the earliest printing the archive HOLDS — not a claim about the earliest that exists.

anished from the Province House, when the spirit of old Esther Dudley took its flight. And now, again, the clock of the Old South threw its voice of ages on the breeze, knolling the hourly knell of the Past, crying out far and \nde through the multitudi- nous city, and filling our ears, as we sat in the dusky chamber, with its reverberating depth of tone. In that same mansion — in that very chamber — what a volmne of history had been tokl off into hours, by the same voice that was now trembling in the air. Many a Governor had heard those midnight accents, and longed t

Nathaniel Hawthorne, Twice-told Tales (1886) — the earliest printing of this tale the archive holds · the document, as the archive holds it

Tellings

A tale told several ways is one record and several tellings. Each is given whole, with its teller named — or recorded as unattributed where the collector left them unnamed, which is itself a fact about the collection.

As printed in Charles M. Skinner (1896)

Told by unattributed — the collector names no informant · collected by Charles M. Skinner · 1896

Boston had surrendered. Washington was advancing from the heights where he had trained his guns on the British works, and Sir William Howe lingered at the door of Province House,--last of the royal governors who would stand there,--and cursed and waved his hands and beat his heel on the step, as if he were crushing rebellion by that act. The sound brought an old woman to his side. “Esther Dudley!” he exclaimed. “Why are you not gone?” “I shall never leave. As housekeeper for the governors and pensioner of the king, this has been my home; the only home I know. Go back, but send more troops. I will keep the house till you return.” “Grant that I may return,” he cried. “Since you will stay, take this bag of guineas and keep this key until a governor shall demand it.” Then, with fierce and moody brow, the governor went forth, and the faded eyes of Esther Dudley saw him nevermore. When the soldiers of the republic cast about for quarters in Boston town, they spared the official mansion to this old woman. Her bridling toryism and assumption of old state amused them and did no harm; indeed, her loyalty was half admired; beside, nobody took the pride in the place that she did, or would keep it in better order. That she sometimes had a half-dozen of unrepentant codgers in to dinner, and that they were suspected of drinking healths to George III. in crusted port, was a fact to blink. Rumor had it that not all her guests were flesh and blood, but that she had an antique mirror across which ancient occupants of the house would pass in shadowy procession at her command, and that she was wont to have the Shirleys, Olivers, Hutchinsons, and Dudleys out of their graves to hold receptions there; so a touch of dread may have mingled in the feeling that kept the populace aloof. Living thus by herself, refusing to hear of rebel victories, construing the bonfires, drumming, hurrahs, and bell-ringing to signify fresh triumphs for England, she drifted farther and farther out of her time and existed in the shadows of the past. She lighted the windows for the king's birthday, and often from the cupola watched for a British fleet, heeding not the people below, who, as they saw her withered face, repeated the prophecy, with a laugh “When the golden Indian on Province House shall shoot his arrow and the cock on South Church spire shall crow, look for a royal governor again.” So, when it was bandied about the streets that the governor was coming, she took it in no wise strange, but dressed herself in silk and hoops, with store of ancient jewels, and made ready to receive him. In truth, there was a function, for already a man of stately mien, and richly dressed, was advancing through the court, with a staff of men in wigs and laced coats behind him, and a company of troops at a little distance. Esther Dudley flung the door wide and dropping on her knees held forth the key with the cry, “Thank heaven for this hour! God save the king!” The governor put off his hat and helped the woman to her feet. “A strange prayer,” said he; “yet we will echo it to this effect: For the good of the realm that still owns him to be its ruler, God save King George.” Esther Dudley stared wildly. That face she remembered now,--the proscribed rebel, John Hancock; governor, not by royal grant, but by the people's will. “Have I welcomed a traitor? Then let me die.” “Alas! Mistress Dudley, the world has changed for you in these later years. America has no king.” He offered her his arm, and she clung to it for a moment, then, sinking down, the great key, that she so long had treasured, clanked to the floor. “I have been faithful unto death,” she gasped. “God save the king!” The people uncovered, for she was dead. “At her tomb,” said Hancock, “we will bid farewell forever to the past. A new day has come for us. In its broad light we will press onward.”

Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896)

Questions this record answers

Each answer is composed only from fields this record carries, and names the attestation for what it says. A question the record cannot answer from its own attested content is not asked here. Where a boundary is described as official it was promulgated by an authority with the power to draw it and is not amended by anything on the vernacular layer; where it is described as vernacular it is held by attestation alone and amends no official boundary.

In which printing does the archive hold Old Esther Dudley?

Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896) The printing is dated 1896. This is the printing this archive's own telling was lifted from, and the archive can hand over the volume. It is not a claim that the tale was first printed there.

Attested by: Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896)

When was Old Esther Dudley first attested in print?

1886, in Nathaniel Hawthorne, Twice-told Tales (1886) — the earliest printing of this tale the archive holds — which is the earliest printing of this tale the archive HOLDS, and older than the collection its own telling comes from. It is not a claim about the earliest printing that exists; it is a claim about a volume the archive can hand over.

Attested by: Nathaniel Hawthorne, Twice-told Tales (1886) — the earliest printing of this tale the archive holds

How many tellings of Old Esther Dudley does the archive hold?

One telling: As printed in Charles M. Skinner (1896) (unattributed — the collector names no informant). A tale told several ways is one record and several tellings, each given whole with its teller named — or recorded as unattributed where the collector left them unnamed, which is itself a fact about the collection.

Attested by: Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896)

Who collected Old Esther Dudley?

Charles M. Skinner. The archive records the collector separately from the teller, because who wrote a tale down and who told it are different facts and collapsing them destroys both.

Attested by: Charles M. Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott, 1896)

What does the archive hold for Old Esther Dudley, and under what license?

The Boston Archive holds this record of Old Esther Dudley from Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (1896), retrieved 2 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929 (public domain). 7 recorded transforms stand between the retrieved bytes and this record. Attribution is due to Charles M. Skinner.

Attested by: Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (1896), retrieved 2 September 2026, under Public domain — published before 1929.

Related records

Identity

Identifier
urn:lemay:boston:entity:old-esther-dudley
Canonical URL
https://boston.fyi/work/old-esther-dudley
As JSON
https://boston.fyi/work/old-esther-dudley.json
Version
2 · last changed 3 September 2026

Provenance

Source
Skinner, Myths and Legends of Our Own Land (1896) — source of record
License
Public domain — published before 1929 (public_domain)
Retrieved
2 September 2026
Source identifier
OLD ESTHER DUDLEY
Attribution
Charles M. Skinner
Rights as stated
Published 1896 and in the public domain in the United States.

Transform ladder

#OperationDescriptionTool
1fetchretrieved the full text of the collection from its public-domain holding institutionarchive-ingest 0.1.0
2segmentsplit the volume into chapters at its own printed headings; the first occurrence of a heading opens the chapter and later occurrences are the running header, which is discardedarchive-ingest 0.1.0
3corroboratematched each heading against the book's own table of contents and took the index's spelling as the title; a heading the index does not carry was refused as a caption, a byline, or scanner noisearchive-ingest 0.1.0
4filterretained the chapters that name a Boston-area place, by the tale's own wordsarchive-ingest 0.1.0
5normalizecollapsed the scan's line breaks; not one word of the telling was altered, added, or removedarchive-ingest 0.1.0
6withdraw-unattested-settingThe setting recorded on this tale — "Boston and eastern Massachusetts" — is the same string carried by every folklore record in this archive. It is the scope of the collections these tales were drawn from, applied at accession, and not a setting read out of this tale by anyone. It was being served as the source's own wording, which it is not, and on a dozen records the tale printed beside it refuted it. The field is cleared rather than reworded: the archive does not hold a per-tale setting and will not imply one.archive-ingest 0.1.0
7withdraw-unattested-collection-placeThe collection place recorded on every telling of this tale — "Boston and eastern Massachusetts" — is the same string carried by every telling in this archive. These tales were compiled from print, not collected from informants in a place, and the field asserted a collection event that did not happen. It is cleared: the teller field already records, correctly, that the collector named no informant, and an absence stated is worth more than a constant that hides it.archive-ingest 0.1.0